When asked to detail what would make a better life in three to five years, 60% of US adults said greater financial security

Americans may seem increasingly divided on beliefs and values, but in a new survey of more than 30,000 adults from across the country spanning generations and economic classes, a majority of Americans agree there’s a significant barrier to achieving a better life: the rising cost of living.

When asked to describe what a better life in three to five years would look like, 60% of Americans said they wanted greater financial security, according to a survey that was conducted by the McKinsey Institute for Economic Mobility and the WK Kellogg Foundation in mid-April.

In interviews that accompanied the survey, respondents often defined financial security as being able to afford basic necessities without worry.

  • myrmidex@belgae.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You had me until that last sentence. When it comes to politicians, I’ve become very jaded. I’ve yet to see the first politician acting solely for the good of his people. Sure one can point at Bernie or Mamdani, but there is a reason they don’t make it to the very top. Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see Mamdani as POTUS, but either that will not happen or he becomes corrupted well before that.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The reason politicians with better social policies don’t make it to the top is the Overton window. If more people voted for representatives that supported such policies, then more would rise higher because there would be fewer elected representatives who did not support such policies. This isn’t complicated.

      If voting was ineffective, the Republican party would not invest so much time and effort into preventing people from doing it.

      Anyone who discourages people from voting is aligned with the goals of voter suppression.

      • myrmidex@belgae.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If voting was ineffective, the Republican party would not invest so much time and effort into preventing people from doing it.

        Voting is effective, sure, in determining which of them are to be bribed the coming years.

        Overton window, sure. Not at all due to people becoming weary of millionaires asking for their vote while claiming to be just like them.

        Anyone who discourages people from voting is aligned with the goals of voter suppression.

        Anyone who encourages people to vote for millionaires is a class traitor. Look, I can be edgy too.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Politicans are not born…

      They’re elected.

      What you’re doing is like an incel bitching about “all women” just because you had bad luck and dated 3 psychos in a row. The problem is never “all ____”, it’s always the ____ you’re choosing.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see Mamdani as POTUS,

      Congrats, you agree with the head of the DNC, whose said multiple times we need presidential candidates like Mamdani.

      Do you understand that? What that means?

      That the DNC and progressive voters agree that a progressive candidate has the best shot at winning?

      You’re being manipulated by the oligarchs into hurting our best chance in generations to win a battle in the class war.

      Because you’re “jaded” which is really the same as “manipulated into being too exhausted to try”

      Wake the fuck up, it’s all hands on deck and ignorance isn’t a valid excuse.

      • myrmidex@belgae.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Go ahead, name one. That would immediately invalidate my claim.

        EDIT: forgot the in- lol

          • myrmidex@belgae.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            the first politician acting solely for the good of his people

            at

            the very top

            who is

            willing to reign in corporations

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 hours ago

              FDR

              Fucking easy, but if you didn’t know that and assumed I somehow knew what you were asking for…

              I’m not going to accomplish anything trying to help you understand anything

              • myrmidex@belgae.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Interesting answer. I’m not that familiar with pre-nixon presidents, I’ll do some reading on FDR. Thanks for the tip!