• tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    They have in Canada and Australia. Aren’t those the places you keep creaming your pants about, hoping the same policies happen here?

    • AnotherWastedHuman@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Can’t rebut my argument (or won’t, which may be telling), so you lamely try to move the goalposts. Hard to take you seriously after that. What happened in those places isn’t going to happen here anytime soon (at least not with regard to guns). There are plenty of other much more pressing issues that should be higher in your priory list.

      BTW in case you didn’t notice, I’m not the person you were talking to a couple comments back.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        anytime soon

        See, it’s saying things like that that’s making people like them skeptical.

        • AnotherWastedHuman@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Riiggghhhhttttt. Ignoring the fact that the distant future is almost completely unpredictable makes people less skeptical. Make sense.

          🙄

          For those of us grounded in reality, the likelihood of gun ownership being forbidden anytime in the foreseeable future – especially when there are so many millions of people out there with them already – is extremely unlikely.

          At the risk of sounding like a “think of the children” argument (which, ironically, that side of the political spectrum loves to misuse), I don’t believe anyone sane wants mentally unfit people to have access to guns.