Looks like Trump is getting more than he bargained for when taking on BBC.

  • nkat2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The BBC responded to the trust Wednesday in a court filing opposing the request to pause the order, arguing it “is a transparent effort to evade this Court’s clear and direct order and to continue to avoid the discovery obligations that Plaintiff took on when he chose to file this lawsuit.”

    Wouldn’t someone in the US with a passing familiarity of lawsuits and who has been in court innumerable times have an inkling about the discovery phase?

    I recognize President Pedophile is incredibly stupid, in addition to being a horrible human being. But I’m struggling to see how he could have made this mistake. Additionally, he has lawyers. This is incredible.

    Good on the BBC for fighting this.

    • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s not a mistake.

      He’s a bully. He thinks he can get away with it, so he does it…because he usually gets away with it.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This. Competent lawyers won’t touch him with a ten foot pole. The ones he’s used up to now have generally failed. He usually squirms his way out of lawsuits in other ways.

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      19 hours ago

      He thought the BBC would roll over like when he sued ABC and they just paid him 15 million and apologized to him. Or when he sued CBS and they paid him 16 million. The issue is that BBC is funded from taxpayer money and I don’t think the British taxpayers would be very happy with them paying Trump.

      • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        ABC did that on purpose. They knew they could use the settlement as a disguised bribe to get preferential treatment from Trump. That was worth more than the legal battle that would drag on for years and net them nothing. He still hasn’t paid E. Jean Carroll. He certainly wouldn’t have paid out the ABC case.

        What they did is the equivalent of paying a crooked cop. It’s textbook racketeering. “Pay me and we’ll protect you.” -every one of the 5 families.

          • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            He could have tried to get their license revoked, but would have lost the ensuing lawsuit on first amendment grounds. ABC was never at risk of losing their license. They willingly chose the bribe. A lawyer that just passed their BAR exam could have won that case.

            • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              59 minutes ago

              but would have lost the ensuing lawsuit on first amendment grounds. ABC was never at risk of losing their license.

              I don’t agree. They could revoke it and drag it through the courts, but it could take years. They also could make up any reason they wanted to distance itself from free speech rules.

              They willingly chose the bribe.

              I agree that the result is the same, but they saw the carrot AND the stick.

      • toph@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Also, as a foreign broadcaster the Trump-controlled FCC can’t threaten the BBC’s license. I think this is a factor in the US-based broadcasters rolling over.

      • wool0698@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s not quite tax payer money, we pay a licence fee to be able to watch live broadcast which funds the BBC (they also get a vast amount of money from licensing shows overseas). But your point is true that the public would be pissed if they just rolled over and paid without fighting Trump

        • D_C@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yep.
          I’m a licence payer and not only would I be very upset if the BBC just paid the raging orange paedo, I also want to offer my services to fight that fat cunt.

          I mean physically. I don’t have the money to win in court, however I’d be verrrrry happy to throw hands.
          Very happy.
          You have no way to gauge how happy I’d be to punch that useless pile of wobbling dementia riddled barrel of rape and corruption.

          • skisnow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 hours ago

            happy to throw hands

            Eh, he’s got some heft to him. You’re better off trying to sweep the leg.

            • Brown5500@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Have you seen his calves though? I’m not sure that a leg sweep is moving one of those. I suppose you might pop it instead which would still be interesting at least.

          • nkat2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Goodness, this was brilliantly stated and I salute you. I think many would want to follow in your lead. An orderly line of eager participants, each wishing to have their turn, might be required.

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m hoping the beeb wins and gets everything they want. It will signal to other entities he’s threatened with lawsuits that he’s a stuffed shirt (and how!) that has more dirt to hide than they do.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        UK law is much more open to discovery than the US, and losers pay. Betcha Trump didn’t know that.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Nope. And there is no mediation, which is why the US is full of ambulance chasers and everyone sues everyone.

          • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Not unless the judge rules that one side must cover the cost incurred by the other. Even then, they could drag out the payment over the course of years due to appeals or bankruptcy filings.

        • foodandart@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Oh, if that’s the case, when he loses, he’ll be chewing what’s left of his hair.

          Trump HATES paying for anything.

          I’ve been in the Trades since 1980 and for years, the running snarky aside about him went “If you want to know whether Trump pays his bills, ask any electrician in New Jersey…”

          Apparently he’s gone through a lot of them and stiffed quite a few over the decades.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      18 hours ago

      he has lawyers

      Despite what he may claim, not the biggest, brightest lawyers. We’re talking Rudy Giuliani, Pam Bondi, Kenneth Chesebro, and Alan Dershowitz.

    • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Additionally, he has lawyers.

      Lawyers he refuses to listen to because he thinks he’s “smarter than them”.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      21 hours ago

      He doesn’t file lawsuits to actually win them, he files them as intimidation. He expects the other side to cave, and to settle. I tried to search for lawsuit Trump actually won on their merits, without a negotiated settlement, and could only find one that was a default judgement (so the other side didn’t even show up).

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I recognize President Pedophile is incredibly stupid, in addition to being a horrible human being. But I’m struggling to see how he could have made this mistake. Additionally, he has lawyers.

      He’s burned through many lawyers and there are few reputable or intelligent lawyers left who might be willing to light their careers on fire. Sure, he might find one willing to trade their career for whatever benefits they might get (or maybe they just have a hard on for fascism, which often means they are fucking stupid too), but most of his lawyers have, eventually, been left holding a flaming bag of shit while Trump transparently lies and pretends he has never heard of them or has heard they aren’t very good.

      It’s happening to pretty much the entire fucking justice department. It used to be a very sought after career. Now they are giving fresh grads signing bonuses and then shuffling them into the meat grinder and sacrificing their reputation to further the administration’s nakedly corrupt agenda. “Hey, new kid, I need you to take this case.” Turns out the case is about some poor immigrant that been detained for months and then deported despite having court orders protecting him from deportation… that were clumsily bypassed with unsigned orders or some other bullshit. New kid sits in front of a frustrated judge yelling at him and the kid can only say “I don’t know what happened” and go home and cry into his pillow.

    • Malyca@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      21 hours ago

      He’s banking on the news not making it over here since he pretty much controls all of the media now.

      • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That’s why I go to the BBC for my local (American) news.

        ANY news agency except American is better. We did it to ourselves.

    • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      He probably assumed it wouldn’t go anywhere, and he didn’t need to do anything, because he’s president.