• joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ve read all your comments so far

    I’m flattered. Did you read the first one where I said it was reductive to equate AI with chatbots?

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      When people say AI they are talking about Gen AI chatbots. Pretending they aren’t in a thread discussing an article where the author is definitely talking about chatbots is being really pedantic.

      • joe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Which was my earlier point. He is wrong when he equates AI with nothing more than chatbots.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          46 minutes ago

          He’s not wrong. He’s talking about what everyone else is talking about and you’re arguing semantics. AI is generic enough of a term that it’s been applied to thousands of things over time. But almost all of the modern hype about “AI” and the stock bubble and everything is referring to the chatbots. I know you know this.

          • joe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            32 minutes ago

            As I said elsewhere, that’s like saying the internet is just websites (and apparently for some people, that’s all it is).

            However, it’s irrelevant, Doctorow may have wanted to just discuss chatbots, but that doesn’t mean that’s all I’m allowed to discuss. I’ve tried to make it clear that I’m not just talking about chatbots. If I wasn’t clear enough on that point, I apologise

            Now that this has been cleared up, do you have anything further to discuss?