idk it’s my first time (kind of) trying to do dataviz, I thought the original post was super interesting but like other comments said, it was hard to read.

I think in a way it’s mostly because defederation is complex to show as links, since it is the break of said link, but hopefully this type of graph is better ?

you do lose the “group” of instances view, though (and also I did not bother with per instance MAU as raw number + percentage, or sofware used)

let me know what you think!

  • Cleisthenian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Modern liberal democracy is authoritarian too, it’s just that a different group of people hold the keys. Would you support defederating with every instance that is aligned with liberal democracy?

    • yoru77@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Modern liberal democracy is authoritarian too, it’s just that a different group of people hold the keys

      I can see that some Western countries lean towards authoritarian, but for example Switzerland? How is this country authoritarian?

      Would you support defederating with every instance that is aligned with liberal democracy?

      Tbh, I can understand the reasons why some instances want to defederate from others. if I look in scenario that I’m the administrator of my own instance I don’t know if I would defederate from any instance, like I don’t think I’m knowledgeable enough about every instance and about their own quirks

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        but for example Switzerland? How is this country authoritarian?

        Every state is going to be authoritarian, if I had to choose I personally prefer a workers dictatorship to a dictatorship of capital.

        • yoru77@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Every state is going to be authoritarian

          Ummm… Any source other than: “trust me”?

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            you’re asking for a ‘source’ on a foundational axiom of political theory. do you want a source for ‘all governments have laws’ too?

            a state is defined by its monopoly on violence, enforcing that is inherently authoritarian.

            switzerland has police, prisons, borders and is structured around protection of capital and property rights.

            ‘democracy’ under capitalism reflects the interests and prejudices of those with property. it is plenty authoritarian if you are not in that class.

            • yoru77@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              After this comment, I don’t believe we hold the same definition for “authoritarian”, and doing mini research, yeah… I don’t think we could come to an understanding, have a good day!

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                mine is an anarchist one, i would like to imagine that after a year on an anarchist instance you would at least have some understanding, but maybe i’m just too hopeful