The U.S. Army has used up much of its stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during its five-month war with Iran, according to three people familiar with the data, raising concerns about the military’s ​readiness for future conflicts.

The missiles are principally the Army’s surface-to-surface weapons, known as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). The U.S. has used “virtually all” of these weapons, according to two of the sources.

The ‌degree to which the military is running out of ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles has not been previously reported.

The long-range munitions are an important part the military’s arsenal, allowing accurate strikes from a safe distance. U.S.-supplied ATACMS have played a key role in the war in Ukraine, allowing Ukrainian forces to attack targets inside Russia. The PrSM is a newer, more advanced generation that will replace the ATACMS, which have a shorter range.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s just exposing how the weapons belong to a dead end tech tree. The future of war is getting fragged by dollar store drones.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly I don’t think that’s what we’re looking at. This is closer to what happened with machine guns and then later tanks during WW1 and WW2. What we’re looking at is a cavalry charge getting shredded by a machine gun and saying mobile warfare is dead, meanwhile the British and French are doing tank R&D.

      This happens every couple of decades and lasts about a decade before proper counters can be developed, mind you it’s still busted as shit until said counters appear but still.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I can’t wait for the weapons industry to unveil the next man made horror beyond my comprehension they’ll think of to counter drone swarms

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          In this particular case it’ll probably be something we already have just cheaper and more specified. Personally my money is on automated AA designed for drones specifically using relatively cheap parts and firing cheap munitions like small caliber rounds to detonate drone payloads. Will probably still cost a hundred bucks or two but that’s well within acceptable costs if they work well enough.

          • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think it will be something we already have, but AI-driven. Probably with autonomous “shooting decision” this time. But I’ve seen enough science fiction to know that’s a can of worms that is best left closed.