• TheLegendaryAssholeOfJushinLiger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Do you think AI is mostly generating slop? Only like 5% of AI use is private individuals.

    The point is that this is not actually an ecological hazard the way people say it is, and that there are much, much more pressing issues if we’re going to fix the environment. Literally all we would have to do to solve global warming is stop eating meat. You see anywhere near as much about that as you do datacenters? Which cause less than one percent of the environmental issues of meat?

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I know all AI is an ecological hazard and none of its use cases aside from very narrow medical and scientific applications justify using it at all.

      People have been eating meat longer than humans have had languages. Your whataboutism is boring and irrelevant. Just because there are other, larger, necessary steps to take doesn’t mean we need to act as unpaid apologists for technocultists shooting our species in the foot while we try to get there. Fuck your AI.