• drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Then you’re not critically trying to think and examine the implications of this new technology.

    I’ve been examining and thinking about artificial neural networks since ~2010.

    It is pretty fucking simple to not use an LLM.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There was a point where it was pretty simple not to use the internet, too. This analogy drives a question: were those people who rejected the internet at the beginning better off in the long run, when compared to people who embraced it?

      Generative AI can be a very useful productivity tool. Choosing not to use an available tool is “easy”, but is it wise?

      I find myself agreeing with the person you responded to; you don’t appear to be thinking critically about the implications of LLMs/generative AI. That, or you are speaking more literally than it seems, and you mean, literally, that it’s easy not to use AI, without commenting on how wise that decision may or may not be.

      • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        you don’t appear to be thinking critically about the implications of LLMs/generative AI

        You don’t appear to have a functioning brain.

        • joe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Hyperbolic insults don’t help your case. If you did think critically about this, feel free to show your work and talk through your thought process.

          Generative AI is just a tool. Using it is not much different than using a thesaurus while writing. You can quickly tell when someone has over-used the thesaurus, and it affects the quality of the output, but that doesn’t make it bad to use a thesaurus.