• Jean-luc Peak-hard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s a few problems with Bluesky if you’re looking for a platform that won’t eventually turn to shit.

    1. The platform is not meaningfully decentralized. With Bluesky directing its future, they have the power to do whatever they want with it, including attempting to monetize and clamp down on access.
    2. Because of point 1 above, Bluesky is able to easily censor users.
    3. To fix points 1 & 2 above you have to run the full stack: a PDS (~$5/month), relay (~$30/month), and AppView (~$300/month), which is prohibitively expensive for most people.

    Hosting your own mastodon instance, which cannot be easily blanket-censored costs ~$5 bucks a month.

    If a system is the outcome it produces, Mastodon is a platform for the people, Bluesky a platform for large orgs.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      And mastodon should be for official/gov instances, they shouldn’t rely on some techbros stuffs. And people following those would make the jump, media are doing it to see Trump daily bullshit, so they would for other, and it would be easier because it’s federated not like Trump Social

      • Jean-luc Peak-hard@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Blacksky is an option. But the point about the platform not being meaningfully decentralized still stands. Your current options with [*]sky are equivalent to only having the option of using either mastodon.social or mstdn.jp, the two biggest mastodon social platforms.

        On the Mastodon side, you have the option of nearly 9k servers to choose from.