• vegeta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.”

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know you didn‘t notice the gorilla either when you tried to count how often the ball was thrown in that clip. We could never really trust our eyes and that‘s okay.

  • ֆᎮ⊰◜◟⋎◞◝⊱ֆᎮ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Having grown up pre-Internet I’ve always just assumed everything on the Internet is fake. It looks like that was the way to go. People really need to adpot that line of thinking now. Treat everything as sus ;)

  • sznowicki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This will eventually settle into a new era of going back to times where people didn’t have cameras in their pockets.

    People eventually will start believing only other people who have some reputation at stake. Like journalists and similar.

    It won’t happen overnight. A lot of harm and bad will happen before we learn it.

    • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think it’s more likely that we’ll need some cryptographic verification at time of recording to be valid, or a physical medium like film to be present. So perhaps film cameras or discs (non rewritable) have a resurgence.

        • AliasAKA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s a hard problem, but there is likely a way with cryptography and upload to server that would be verifiable. Honestly this may be the only legitimate use of blockchain.

            • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Not really

              You can publish public keys and sign the videos with private keys

              It still doesn’t prove the video is not AI, just that it comes from a specific source, like a press camera

              • Kairos@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                You can always retroactively sign. Or it would require secretive hardware managed by some centralized authority, and would be exploitable by at least nation state actors.

            • holemcross@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Not true. This is something I had researched in the early days. If you can store a crypto hash of the document on a Blockchain, you can upload said document anywhere you want for people to DL. The hashes will always match, and you can use the timestamp of the Blockchain entry as reference to veracity. This could be done via an open source project and should the maintainers fall off the map, some one can always fork.

              I remember seeing this listed as something like “proof of existence”.

  • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Was with family and wanted to find a clip on YouTube that demonstrated people being tricked by 3d chalk art. I couldn’t find a clip that was not AI slop (lots and lots of these) or just faked reactions. Won’t bother trying that again :D