• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The awkward part is that software has a habit of racing toward free once it becomes good enough

    Has it? Jira, Teams, Slack, Google Meet, Cisco WebX… There’s obviously Jitsi but I don’t see companies racing towards it. When it comes to SaaS most companies prefer to pay and be done with it. Few are choosing to host open source solutions. Windows and Mac are also way more popular than Linux in office settings. With LLMs hosting it will be even more complicated because companies will have to invest heavily in GPUs.

    If the bubble bursts companies will lose funds to work on new models but someone will still be able to offer existing models as a service. Companies will chose the one with better price and functionality. Being free or not will have little to do with it.

    • eicker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Unfortunately, based on many years of experience, I have to agree. However, I also see a light at the end of the tunnel, particularly in Europe, where there is a growing desire to break free from the US SaaS stranglehold, using open source software.

      Regarding OWAI I see a fundamental difference: Slack isn’t just software, it’s a hosted service with identity, storage and network effects.

      An open weight model is more like a compiler: once downloaded, nobody can revoke it. You may still pay for inference, but pricing power drops when anyone can host the same model.