• MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Goodbye local Windows, you mean. Except I said goodbye two years ago and never looked back or missed it. Windows does nothing I need, and does it poorly.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m still petty enough to hope this effort is a miserable failure, but ultimately I don’t care all that much.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Goodbye local Windows with Linux having a 3% market share means entirely different market & society too, regardless of our Linux desktops that can’t get new parts.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ll just point out that 3% market share is still bigger than the entire market when started building PCs. And that’s assuming they can make this attractive to anyone. Single point of failure for your entire company? Single supplier who has you over a barrel when they want to raise prices? Who in their right mind would go for that.

        We’ll see. The fact that it’s on offer doesn’t mean people will bite. I’ve seen the industry try so much stupid shit that people said no to. Free computer full of ads? No. Scan cat? No. Packing LEDs into things that don’t need to light up or be hotter? Well… they got us there.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yes, good points, but what can make financial sense doesn’t need to make economical sense.

          Perhaps in such events we can transition to smaller, maybe RISK-V boards with components from various manufacturers.

          But yes, I too keep hoping consumers would speak up & stop bs practices. Then again, if we kill a consumer industry you can’t just bring it back in a year, and megacorps can weather in the meantime by offering consumers short-term incentives if they make the switch. It’s how all the personal data collection by private corps started, why eg Google had free services (and no ads) & yet was already being valued in the billions.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Free computer full of ads? No.

          people are paying for that nowadays. they call them smartphones. even the operating system and base apps show ads.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m really worried about this, I don’t think it’ll become a universal standard by all means but I can see Microslop forcing this onto people as a kinda next step from all the hardware limitation bs.

    They would finally have total control over your OS.

    • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’ve been pushing the thin client for years and it’s never taken off. You and I wouldn’t be the target for this machine and neither would gamers or content creators. This is for business or grandparents.

      • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s never taken off because of relatively inexpensive and abundant hardware. But these will be attractive to people who need something now and want something inexpensive.

        Grandparents are the immediate target but eventually if they force the hardware supply shortages soon some people will need something.

        Imagine students with low budget.

        The next 5 years are going to be really interesting.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Grandparents don’t want to rent shit. They want to buy it and be done. Source: this old fuck right here.

          • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Fair. But what if they completely eliminate the ability to buy hardware? like only selling to the AI fucks? Do grandparents not get phone plans for example?

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is a Thinnet client. They have been around for at least 26 years.

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Walk into any office or business that runs off the cloud or a local server and they will likely have dozens… I mean dozens of these lying around.

      I know the gaming community looks at these like a vampire looks at a rosary but it isn’t new tech or even a new concept.

      • whaleross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Back 25 years ago the company I worked for was looking into changing the computers for thin clients, then powered by JAVA, aaand of course dynamic workplaces that gets reinvented every seven years or so.

        In the end they decided not to because people wanted to feel that they had their desk with their computer and not a floating office limbo as daily reminder that they are replaceable labour.

        But most of all, their stationary computer had a CD ROM so they could listen to their own music while working and the thin clients couldn’t even customise your wallpaper.

        • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The only real case I can think of where people like thin clients is when they move between stations. I worked at a hospital that used them and it was a fantastic solution. A doctor/nurse/whatever could walk up to any station, beep their ID, and a couple second later their session would load up. It was a huge pain in the ass to build and maintain though. These new devices might actually have a benefit there. Managing W365 through Azure/Intune is leagues easier than managing Citrix with Windows VM pools.

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    What in the name is the flying spaghetti monster is Windows 365? An even less private version of windows that won’t work is you don’t have internet?

    • xavier666@lemmy.umucat.dayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The OS is fully running on the cloud. You will be given a VM. Everything stays there. You may have to take permission to download a file from the VM onto your local device. You don’t get any choice about telemetry.

  • orioler25@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I feel bad for the poor bastards that will certainly have these forced on them at the office or at school.

    • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Apparently my job will be getting rid of our personal local network drives (we each have our own only we can connect to) and moving that to Microsoft one drive. Our IT guy hates the new changes, but the orders come from way above. Not sure how well it will work…

      • Lycist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        We use onedrive at work… everything goes onto onedrive, and then daily we have people bitching that onedrive has deleted their files.

  • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, when the AI market crashes they will have lots of unused datacenters… Guess they found an use for that after all.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Back in 2008-2009 I shared this crazy idea with my peers that Microsoft was moving towards an “always connected” OS that would probably be hosted on their servers, because you can make more money charging someone for access to their data than charging them once for their OS.

    they laughed it off and told me that nobody would fall for that.

    …who’s laughing now assholes?

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It was never crazy and people were predicting this since the 90s. It’s essentially a return to the dumb terminal & mainframe paradigm that was in use prior to desktop pcs.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I see this going nowhere

    For a few hundred bucks I have a mini PC with which I can do anything I want

    This thing, even at half price, would only allow office365, with monthly payments.

    Who the fuck would want that and not just spend a few bucks more and have an actual computer?

  • PangurBan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m so sick of Microsoft I actually installed Fedora KDE Plasma.

    Genuinely, it’s nicer than windows lol

    The occasional forum crawling is a bit annoying, but overall it works really well, has more features and looks slick.

    Ain’t ever going back.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The occasional forum crawling is a bit annoying

      I was on windows since 3.1, dual booted various distros of Linux the past 15 years, and removed windows from my computers over a year ago.
      I would have to crawl forums to find fixes for stupid shit in windows once in awhile, less than Linux 15 years ago, but more than Linux in the lead up to getting rid of it. The thing that really pissed me off was the most egregious issues with win10/11 that id be looking for solutions to would always be changed back on the next update.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Businesses will adore this. I can guarantee a lot of us will be forced to use these at work, like Teams and CoPilot, as a further mega deal with Microsoft.

    …But honestly, I think “home” buyers who don’t really care about PC stuff, aka most people, would pick tablets over this.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Business’s will not adore this. Cloud PCs in M365 or Azure cost money, often as much per year as it would cost to just purchase a pc to begin with.

  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This is horrifying in that it signals a concerted push towards getting consumers on cloud computing.

    But in terms of self hosting your own compute these actually look great, especially if they’re subsidized to get you into a subscription fee. As long as we can break into the bootloader and run Linux on these, they look to be very capable and efficient small compute boxes. 2.5Gbps Ethernet ports, DDR5 memory, and Intel N series processors?

    Self hosters and homelabbers will be licking their lips.

    • xavier666@lemmy.umucat.dayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      These fuckers themselves have increased the price of PC components and now they have the gall to release this cloud-only PC to “alleviate the problem of the current market scenario”.

      I have a sneaking suspicion that these PCs will have some sort of protection so that nothing other than Win365 can run. Maybe a locked bootloader/secureboot?

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have a sneaking suspicion that these PCs will have some sort of protection so that nothing other than Win365 can run. Maybe a locked bootloader/secureboot?

        Yes. Very probably.

        Of course, no security mechanism lasts indefinitely in the hands of a persistent hacker with physical access.