• MonaySimpson@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m not defending this shit by any means but I am partly conflicted.

    It’s fine to talk with your money and take it elsewhere. However, I wonder what the CEOs and staff of other VPNs spend their money on and how far this goes.

    Say this Mullvad dude donated 10% of his income to the campaign. If your local vape store guy, McDonalds owner or whoever gave 10% of theor income to man-o-sphere influencers or right wing parties (as is probably common) would people be as outraged and walk? Or is it lower stakes and doesn’t matter?

    I guess ultimately, as a root issue, people shouldn’t able to make and hord wealth like this, nor fund politicians.

    Again not defending this but it’s just made me think about some things.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Lower stakes probably would have deescalated things a bit, i think. In this case the guy in question funds 80-90% of the political party in question which makes this whole thing feel even worse.