• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    You said “that’s not how they work”. But that is how they work. Same prompt = same output. Throw some random data in there to jumble things around and you get a little variance. That’s the seed, and we only need to do that because LLMs are inherently deterministic.

    Same reason Minecraft has a random seed for world generation, and block cipher algorithms use an initialization vector and/or feedback loop. We don’t want the same thing every time.

    I did say that you’re right, because the tooling we use around the LLM itself does exactly what you’re talking about. So, in practice, you’re right.

    • anothermember@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Again, you’re telling me what I already know, because you’re still assuming. I can make the point that same prompts don’t produce the same output without explaining about random seeds.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I honestly wasn’t trying to attack you. I think we should be careful when we talk about LLMs, because it’s important for people to know that it’s just a bunch of math in a computer program. A lot of people have a tendency to anthropomorphize it.