• Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    By that logic he’s not a trillionaire at all. They only sold 4% of the company for some 68 billion USD. A trillion dollars was never liquidated.

    Edit: 4.3% and 75 billion are the correct numbers.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah sure I also think that he is a trillionare at the moment. I was just trying to show that it’s absurd to say he has the money even if the stock price falls because he’s already liquidated it.

        • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          To add to what the other user said, this is why the rich convert their money into real estate wealth as well. Not only does it hold its value better than cash, it appreciates faster than any savings account ever could, and the wealthy take a loan out on it when they need cash, and then pay that loan off with money from a loan on a different piece of property.

          By repeating this over and over, they go their whole lives without ever having to actually give up any of their assets to pay off any of these loans, and when they die, the debt disappears alongside them.

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Almost all of them. That’s how the Epstein class fund their lifestyles, they borrow against their stocks. This is why the Epstein class always want low interest rates; it is not about mortgages, at least not the kind where someone is homeless because they missed a payment.

          https://taxproject.org/carried-interest/