• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    (Although TBH, I would really love to have a wearable computer that was fully open source and local. Unfortunately, big tech going full Orwell has ruined the idea permanently.)

    • TIEPilot@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think I would rather have AR glasses then glasses w/ a camera.

      Yeah more I think about it the more I can get behind that.

          • Thorry@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 hour ago

            A HUD and AR are something different tho.

            A HUD is just a display you can look at while keeping your focus on something else. My car has that, it has no relation to the outside world, it’s just a display.

            With AR the information presented is placed within the world around you. Using a camera and motion tracking, it can place stuff in relation to real stuff around you. Think Pokemon-Go.

    • TIEPilot@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Oh I would love a computer on my face to that isn’t part of some BS like meta. How fun would it be to look at an object and ask “what is it” and it can find the answer. On a sidebar giving you real time health updates like heart rate, O2 levels, ect. Oh theres a storm rolling in, good to know I’ll roll my cars windows up.

      Or my fav, your approaching a flock camera, here is an alternate route.

      Plus news/rss/emails all in a AR setting.

      But we all know this is probably never going to happen because these scumbags want to monetize/teach their failing AI to make a buck.