• f314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yes, they are slower. However, I think that the pricing we’re going to see from the cloud providers might be enough to deter quite a lot of people. At least I hope so:

    The fact that we’re already used to blazing speed generation kinda sucks. Local models are a much more sustainable way of unlocking the benefits of LLMs than giant ecosystem- and community-destroying data centers.

    • mysteryhumpf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I also hope that don’t get me wrong, but as I said: Waiting for the LLM agent to finish coding is currently a bottleneck in software development, they don’t pay high salaries for watching the AI code, they will prefer faster agents even if they are expensive, because they are not only paying the AI Company but also the software engineer overseeing them.

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I think that is only going to last as long as the AI providers are willing to operate at a loss. The issue is even with the newer higher price points rolled out this year, they’re still losing money. The slower AI machines may be the answer once the REAL profit earning price for the use tokens hits the market. I forsee lots of alternative work going on while the small LLM’s are cooking the data. We will have to see once these machines start to roll out, what the use for LLMs will be and how it’s applied. I am hopeful.