anus@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoA cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environmentandymasley.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkA cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environmentandymasley.substack.comanus@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square3fedilink
minus-squareanus@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThank you for your considered and articulate comment What do you think about the significant difference in attitude between comments here and in (quite serious) programming communities like https://lobste.rs/s/bxixuu/cheat_sheet_for_why_using_chatgpt_is_not Are we in different echo chambers? Is chatgpt a uniquely powerful tool for programmers? Is social media a fundamentally Luddite mechanism?
minus-squareRooki@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoI would say GitHub copilot ( that uses a gpt model ) uses more Wh than chatgpt, because it gets blasted more queries on average because the “AI” autocomplete just triggers almost every time you stop typing or on random occasions.
Thank you for your considered and articulate comment
What do you think about the significant difference in attitude between comments here and in (quite serious) programming communities like https://lobste.rs/s/bxixuu/cheat_sheet_for_why_using_chatgpt_is_not
Are we in different echo chambers? Is chatgpt a uniquely powerful tool for programmers? Is social media a fundamentally Luddite mechanism?
I would say GitHub copilot ( that uses a gpt model ) uses more Wh than chatgpt, because it gets blasted more queries on average because the “AI” autocomplete just triggers almost every time you stop typing or on random occasions.