• WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    You wrote the words “basic humanity” as if that was supposed to make sense as a justification for a rule. Don’t think we’ve seen a reason.

      • Kellenved@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have empathy for the people whose lives were made miserable by republican policies graham championed and I celebrate one less champion of those policies fucking people over

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          There’s a big difference between Kissinger and Graham, I mentioned this in another reply, but it bears repeating…

          Kissinger had the power and ability to act alone in his atrocities.

          Graham, as a member of the Senate, did not have that ability. Whatever evils he enacted, he was able to do so with the consent of a majority of the House, Senate and President.

          Kissinger did what he wanted, Graham literally could not on his own.

          Not saying he did good things, he was a complete tool, but a majority of the Legislative branch signed off on the things he did. Not the same thing at all.

          • Axolotl@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            he was able to do so with the consent of a majority of the House, Senate and President.

            So he was still a bad person but also other people agreed with him and enabled him to do bad stuff

            This is like saying “Jeff was not a bad person, they would restrain him so he couldn’t kill, while Josh was a very bad person because he could kill without restriction”