• Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t care how “open source” the printer claims to be. Both hardware and software belong to Belzebub. Such was the dark pact printer makers signed in blood decades ago, and all land shall obey by those words. We shall hit the print button and wallow in torment forever.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Would be nice, if it was USB by default and Ethernet/Wifi just a module you attach. For most private users, the IoT part of printers is actually a security hazard. Especially for such a portable device.

    Edit: private users

  • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    3 days ago

    On the one hand, I’m really excited about this because the printer industry is literally the worst. On the other hand, I haven’t printed anything for years, I probably won’t use it much/ever.

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 days ago

      I print things still pretty consistently. Random forms that need hard copies to have a wet signature, activity sheets for the kids to color, templates for drilling holes in walls, etc. Make the business a lot less toxic and I think you’ll start seeing printers in more homes again.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its probably just much cheaper and easier, unless you absolutely have to have color, to go to good will and get a brother laser printer for like 10 bucks.

      I got one years ago and its still on the original toner cart it came with, and I print decently often.

      • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I tried that once with a Dell LaserJet. Managing printer drivers was a nightmare, and every time I plugged it in, the lights flickered. Eventually I got rid of it because the hassle wasn’t worth the effort.

      • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Pity and Shame typically go hand an hand, you’ll hear people say “That’s a shame” but you can replace shame with pity “That’s a pity” and achieve the same result.

        However when addressing another person, you won’t hear people say “I shame you” instead you’ll hear “I pity you” to show displeasure or anger to another person.

        Hope this helps!

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      But you can just refill those yourself. The biggest problem with HP printers is that it times out cartridges, even if there’s ink left.

    • justaman123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      From what I can tell the print head is built into the cartridge and that’s the hard part for printer technology.

      But I think you might be right depending only on the hp cartridge will open them up to cease and desist. If they make it also use a cannon cartridge that also has a print head then I think they might be ok

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the fact that it’s hardware will prevent any cease and desist (or rather the legal teeth behind them). It’s not licensed IP but a physical product.

        Like I think of it more like 3rd party car parts. Depending on the part, they often need to target specific makes, models, and even years of cars. It’s why so many parts have had encrypted handshakes with the main computer (John Deere is famous for this but I understand some cars are doing it for some parts these days, too) because they couldn’t just stop them in the courts.

        I’m not sure that this is how it will work but hopefully. Also selling ink cartridges is how HP makes its money and it uses some of that money to subsidize the printers themselves, so they might like that this printer sells more of those rather than moving entirely away from their ecosystem.

        • justaman123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, ultimately it probably does end up selling more cartridges over time. Like even with the refillable ones you still gotta replace them eventually because of the print heads. Honestly, the more I think about it I think I’m just gonna continue to not print things out at my house and just use the Kinko’s when I need to for a dime a page. I mean how much do I actually print out anyway. This is the same math I did when decided not to buy another ink cartridge last time my printer stopped working

    • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Don’t bother my Brother, brother from another mother! We’re Brother brothers!

      Semantic satiation is kicking in…

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which one? I find the print quality from Brother to be below HP, I think because Brother uses LED and not laser.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    inkjet

    Virtually useless unless it supports non consumer ink cartridges or you buy chinese drop in knockoffs.

    And even then only if you need to print graphics/images in high quality.

    All hail laser.

    • scholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      hooray my fuser has jammed, my transfer belt has stretched, toner is smeared everywhere, my printer weighs a ton.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have wiped a toner cartridge with a paper towel and chucked thst sucker back into a ye olde HP from 20 years ago with a broken guider clip and it still prints perfectly fine.

        I wiped it because it was leaving a smudge at the edge of the paper after never cleaning the rollers for aforementioned 20 years.

        I guess I can add briefcase printer for mission impossible as a use case for inkjet lol

        • ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          HP Laserjet 4000 here. I love it. I could use it to kill a skunk and then put it back on the desk and print a novel for $0.25

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      Expect this to be priced like a laser printer. Most inkjet printers are subsidized by cartridge lock in and ink priced higher than platinum by ounce.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Honestly, I don’t mind inkjet as a technology, the quality is plenty good and I don’t give a crap about speed. And as you can see from this design they’re a whole lot more compact. The whole reason I don’t use them is the predatory ink pricing, which this product in theory solves!

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          For now, you can get inkjet printers that use liquid ink. Ostensibly Canon wants me to use Canon brand ink for my printer, but there’s nothing stopping me from buying some off brand and dumping it in the tanks

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Tank inkjets tend not to be subsidized because of the lack of lock in. They’re considerably more expensive than those that use cartridges. So you are paying for the ability to put in whatever you want.

  • xSikes@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    I want to support this but what stops me is ink. Is ink the best choice over toner or laser?

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is still work to do before it lands in users’ hands. The team says it is optimizing the ink-drying system, refining printhead cleaning cycles, improving paper insertion, and trying to boost print speeds. On the software side, work continues on Wi-Fi and Ethernet connectivity, as well as dithering algorithms designed to improve image quality.

    Here’s the video of it in action:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB7iAFXCJQM

  • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Dude just get a powder toner laser printer. I’ve been filling the stock toners in my Lexmark instead of buying ink. Fuck, ink.

  • Lanvjscdlk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s cool, but “It uses refillable HP cartridge bodies – HP 63 in the US and HP 302 in Europe” worries me. I used to have a high-end inkjet for art prints, and then they discontinued the ink cartridges. You can still technically get them on ebay, but they’re at scalpers mark-up. So I don’t hold much hope for this lasting in the long run.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would be surprised if a cartridge being discontinued would kill an open source project like this. They could switch to a different cartridge.

      I’d assume they’re doing the one for now because it’s cheap-ish and has widespread availability. There’s little reason not to expand to other cartridges once the rest of the printer is more stable.