Two Catholic bishops have expressed regret about agreeing to a White House meeting that produced a publicly distributed photo of them praying with Donald Trump.

Milwaukee Archbishop Jeffrey Grob, in a statement titled “A Public Apology,” said Sunday that he had received many questions and comments — some of them distraught — about the meeting on Thursday which he and 11 other bishops attended.

He said the meeting was speedily publicized by the White House with photos and a video, without consent of the participants, and less than two weeks away from the midterm elections.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Bullshit. They were adults when it was all over the news that trump gassed a church, making the pastor run for cover in order to hold a bible for a photo op. No way they weren’t aware this is who he is.

    They got some negative feedback and have buyer’s remorse, that is all. No empathy or humanity except the performative South Park rubbing-my-nipples kind of ‘I’m sorry’ after the fact. It’s so pathetically transparent.

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Religious morons need to shut up and keep their “expertise” to memorizing made-up hysterical fairy tales.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Shut up, trying to have your cake and eat it too. You knew exactly what would happen at this meeting.

    Not exactly the first time a bishop has lied to my face though.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There might legit be riots if a president ever got on their knees and prayed to Allah in the oval office. Like no joke I think that would break some people.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    US Catholic bishops are far more right-wing than Catholic bishops elsewhere in the world, and they have long interfered in politics to support rightwing causes including MAGA. But it seems now that they’re embarrassed to be seen near Trump.

    More rats leaving a ship that’s holed below the water line.

  • Devial@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Why the fuck else did these utter idiots think one of the least Christian men on Planet earth would invite them for a prayer meeting ?

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    the meeting was speedily publicized by the White House with photos and a video, without consent of the participants, and less than two weeks away from the midterm elections.

    Imagine being so naive to believe that it wouldn’t be politicized - or that the White House believed in consent.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      These bishops are mostly rightwingers, so they’re playing a delicate balancing act between kissing Trump’s incontinent ass and not pissing off Pope Bob enough to get fired.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      No consent required. The White House is a government building and no expectation of privacy exists.

      • Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Legally yes.

        But professionally there should have existed a courtesy to where the clergy could have been asked if they wanted the photo of them standing next to the dementia riddled rapist felon posted to the wh propaganda channels and maybe been given the ability to say no.

        I don’t know why they even entertained a meeting with the psychopathic toddler’s regime. That was the real mistake.

        • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          the photo of them standing next to the dementia riddled rapist felon

          …was probably the entire point of the exercise, from the regime’s perspective, and I can’t understand how anyone headed to the White House wouldn’t understand this.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          the photo of them standing next to the dementia riddled rapist felon

          I agree that agreeing to stand next to the dementia riddled pedophile rapist felon was the obvious thing to avoid.

          • BooBees@fedinsfw.app
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Can’t believe no one yet has mentioned that it’s not all public. The West Wing, the Oval Office, and private working or living quarters inside the White House are restricted areas where casual photography is prohibited, and access or photography requires special credentials, an invitation, and direct Secret Service supervision.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          WH audiences are a matter of public record. These people weren’t playing with a full deck anyway, but this is some idiocy on their part.