Microsoft is losing Builders fast. They’re switching to MacOS and Linux. The biggest pull keeping people on Windows, outside of shear inertia, is content creation and gaming. However, even these are falling to Linux.

Without Builders, you don’t have software, and without software, you don’t have users. This is why Microsoft needs Windows Lite.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    What is wrong with .NET, it’s very useful when running applications which require it which of course is basically every application in a corporate environment.

    But yeah all the other things are fine.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    windows lite

    So you mean Linux? No telemetry? No ads? No AI? No .net? Also just works? Also free? Also free as in beer?

    Yeah, people need Linux

  • khánh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    in sum, linux with backwards compatability (a lazy excuse for not cleaning stuff up) and DOS commands. oh, and closed source.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Windows losing noticeable numbers of users is a huge net gain for society. Hopefully it continues, regardless of Microslop’s actions.

  • lil_baka@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Microsoft is losing Builders fast.

    Good.

    This is why Microsoft needs Windows Lite.

    No, Windows needs to lose more users. Hope they never change.

    • pelya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      If there was a viable Windows Lite

      But there is, and it’s called Linux Mint.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I wouldn’t, but many of my friends that I finally convinced to switch to Linux would definitely consider it. They switched specifically because MS went too far and made things too awful, and gaming in Linux is now quite decent. They aren’t using Linux for the open source philosophy, or to tinker in ways that Windows blocked decades ago, or even the free price tag.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        I would be quite prepared to pay a price for an operating system if it meant that it just works the way that Windows just works but without all the bloat. I’m really not all that interested and installing an operating system that likes to fight me.

  • madthumbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    All the things that are easily disabled? -Sounds as foolish as having a distro for changing wallpaper, fonts and color scheme.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    why would they? the telemetry, spying and bloatware is the whole idea for them. At least for regular users. We are the product and the data they harvest from us and ads they force on us is the point. And why would they care, majority of people just sticks with whatever was presented to them first. No matter how much bloat and spyware they add, majority will never care enough to do anything about it because it doenst directly affect them beyond slowing the computer down, which they think will be solved by buying a new one.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 minutes ago

        I don’t really know what it is, but I do know that a whole bunch of stuff doesn’t work if you don’t have it installed. That and Java.

        • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          38 seconds ago

          It’s just a framework for some code (usually that written in C#) to run on. It’s not a windows only thing either. Just that on Linux if it’s required it’ll just get installed via the package manager, do you won’t see the usual GUI installer that is often packaged with some games (even though you might already have it installed).

  • minfapper@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Hah! They don’t care about “builders” or users. They care about business. Specifically large enterprises the have too many people to care about a single employee’s individual productivity.

    Microsoft caters mostly to them and is quite good at that.

    But if you’re an end user, gamer, or individual consumer, just move to Linux already. They don’t care about you.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, the proprietary software grift is all about extorting companies with legal liability, hostage data, etc.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        Some of Microsoft’s corporate products are actually quite good, if very boring. I would love it if Linux had some version of Active Directory, although Microsoft’s attempts to cloudify it are a very annoying. Fortunately you can just ignore that, at least for now.

        They also get a lot of credit for releasing VSCode for free as well.