• iocase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    can we stop using the word quietly!? I am so quietly sick of hearing the word quietly in every god damn sentence I see

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      So it’s like last of us, but instead of making everyone a zombie, it makes everyone an drooing asshole with the goal of making the entire planet a radiated nuclear wasteland.

      My god, we’ve been blaming social media for that. We are doomed! AI threat was just a diversion.

  • Denixen@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    According to the article there exists no evidence that it actually synthesis energy from the radiation. The title is a flat out lie. It is a hypothesis with zero evidence.

    Also, it claims melanin that makes it dark, like our skin, is part of the synthesis, but an easier explanation is that it is there to protect against radiation, just like how melanin in our skin protects us from solar radiation.

    The whole idea of “radio-synthesis” is pseudoscientific bullshit with nothing to back it up.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I disagree - there’s a massive corpus of science fiction behind it. Protomolecule!!

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      it’s a hypothesis… making hypotheses and verifying them is how science progresses. you can’t dismiss every single unproven hypotheses as pseudoscience. that is in fact, unscientific.

      on the other hand, i am tired of media sensationalising as well…

      • HollowNaught@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The bigger problem here is that the paper is stating an (as of currently) unsupported hypothesis as a definitive fact

    • scratchee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, and not like it needs to eat radiation to be successful, all it has to do is survive in a place where everything else dies, and suddenly it has no competitors or predators, and is free to grow explosively.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder if theres a possibility to line a spaceship haul with this stuff to protect from cosmic radiation.

    • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s an interesting thought, but according to the article, it’s not even clear that the fungus is absorbing radiation or befitting from radiation. Actual photosynthesis-via-radiation hasn’t been demonstrated; it might simply be taking advantage of the absence of other species due to high radiation, or the radiation is triggering a stress response.

      Beyond that, I’m not sure this fungus would have a better protection-per-ton rating than, say, water (which is an astoundingly good radiation shield). But, it might point us towards ways of developing plants which are radiation-tolerant, theoretically opening a path to growing food in orbital or lunar-surface environments.