• mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We simply need to tax billionaires at 99% and codify copyright law to require that AI training data is explicitly licensed by the rights holders.

    What we are seeing right now is a turducken of exploitation of the working and creative class by techno-oligarchs, and we must reject it.

  • darklamer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I grew up long after cars had already become commonplace in our city but we still played in our residential street for drivers had learned to navigate safely around playing children.

    • setsubyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      47 minutes ago

      Apparently he’s 63. So he would have played in the streets in 1960ies Taiwan or Thailand. Both countries where most people couldn’t afford cars at the time.

      Here in Germany, we can still play in the streets in 2026. We have streets designated for it.

  • IratePirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “I used to have a living wage, friends I could talk to, affordable energy and water and intelligence that allowed me to think critically and make decisions for myself. When billionaires came along with their glorified digital parrots, you obviously can’t have all that now.”

  • metermatic26@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Do these new social norms include taxing the ultra-rich, to help subsidize the retraining and re-employing of many people who’s jobs will lost due to AI?

    • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      He grew up in Taiwan & Thailand so in the 60s/70s so it’s possible, not everywhere was as car pilled as the US then