• hemmes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Many microblogging and aggregation platform users prefer to ask questions within a thread to keep the conversation active. You can continue scrolling through other posts while waiting for an organic reply from another user.

        • Summzashi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          Nah, a proper question and contribution would be to ask what the lawsuit is about. It’s ridiculous to expect others to explain what a high profile game is, that’s what a search engine is for. It takes literally 5 second or less to Google it and look at screenshots to understand what’s the point here.

          This isn’t contributing anything. If your “active” conversation is nothing more than asking about widely available facts, it’s nothing but noise and might as well not be there.

  • nous@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I don’t think this is the win we want. Sounds like palwprld change the game to no longer infringe on Nintendo copyright claims. So Nintendo can no longer seek an injunction. They are still seeking damages.

    I really want to see the copyright claims be challenged in court so we know where we stand. Rather then the continual settling out of court because Nintendo has more money.

    It doesn’t sound like Nintendo are on track to win or lose this. Just Palworld changed the game to limit the impact of the lawsuit. Which is in a way a small win for Nintendo.

    • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      It is Japanese copyright court, so it’s a clusterfuck and loosely makes sense. Nintendo won’t lose and PocketPair won’t win. It will be some shit decision in the middle.