Telegram’s core domain t.me has been placed on serverHold at the .me registry, effectively removing it from global DNS and rendering all t.me links inaccessible.

The change occurred today, according to domain records. As of now, there has been no official explanation from Telegram, the .me registry, or backend operator Identity Digital.

A serverHold is a registry-level status that completely dead-ends the domain, preventing it from resolving anywhere in the world.

  • endofline@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Can’t they save their signed bootstrapping servers lists in many ipfs locations? Centralized Services are always doomed to fall first. I’m not saying I’m fan of Durov ( he’s shoddy man - see his “hidden” travels to Russia after being “expelled” or “at large”)

  • mercano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The .me top level domain is nominally the TLD for the country of Montenegro, but in practice, it gets used more for its English meaning rather than for that country. The same thing happens with Tuvalu’s .tv TLD.

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Theoretically, yes. But .me domains are pretty cheap, ~10$/year from Joker and likely even cheaper elsewhere.

          • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            15% of GDP just from TLD is wild. But they have only ~10k people there, so makes sense that their GDP isn’t really high.

            Montenegro is ‘a bit’ bigger country by GDP, so for them it’s a lot closer to rounding error.

      • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        To my knowledge, they peered with other registrars and hosts to manage the vending. At least, in 2008 ish they partnered almost exclusively with Apple (for their MobileMe cloud and email services issuing everyone dotME addresses) and GoDaddy. I think others had to resell somehow through them? But I could be mistaken on that detail.

        Domain squatting was a very profitable scourge on the internet back before all the obvious names were brought up , but it was one of the few popular TLD’s to gain any real traction with consumers until dotAI.

        I very briefly held, and did nothing with, “pants.me” which I regret to this day.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      A lot of ccTLDs get used outside their countries because they’re cheap too.

      I’ve got a .pw name (Palau) because it was only 11$.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Wtf is that inaccessible page layout? White heading on white background. Then the same huge image without content again.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I realize we don’t like Telegram but we shouldn’t be supporting exploiting control over DNS in pursuit of surveillance.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think the fact that Telegram is constantly in legal hot water indicates that it’s not.

          • esc@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Ah yes, the messenger built by r*ssians in r*ssia, that used r*ssian AS, that was used by r*ssian army for three years. The one that rolled their own verily secure encryption (that doesn’t work anywhere but 1-1 chats), that was questioned from day 1. That was constantly unblocked and blocked by r*ssian government, that was paid by fsb, that r*ssian government literally said is theirs isn’t a surveillance machine. Right. Everything indicates that it isn’t.

            • Darkassassin07@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Russia’s been actively trying to push their own Telegram replacement called ‘Max’, while throttling access to Telegram to discourage it’s use.

              They have outright blocked Telegram before (2018) because they refused to hand over users encryption keys to the FSB. That sparked outrage and protests because of it’s widespread use, and was ultimately overturned because of it’s heavy use even within the Russian government.

              The more recent throttling has been causing huge struggles within their own military units because they’ve become dependent on it, as well as struggles with their ability to push propaganda outside Russia.

              Youtube, 13:35 for Telegram+Discord.